- Analysis of Yakiri Rubio Aupart's Case: Self-Defense in Mexico
- Contextual Background
- "Innocence" Challenged: The Court of Public Opinion vs. Official Injustice
- "Jailing a Hero":
- "A Call for Justice": The Persistent Fight Against Impunity in Mexico
- "The Ripple Effect"": Inspiring Change Beyond One Woman's Case
- Preguntas frecuentes
- FAQs About Yakiri Rubio Aupart's Case of Self-Defense Rights In Mexico
- Texto original (2014)
- #FreeYakiri
Nota editorial (2025): publicado originalmente en 2014. Se añadió una versión estructurada con fines enciclopédicos. El texto original se conserva íntegro como parte del archivo histórico.
Analysis of Yakiri Rubio Aupart’s Case: Self-Defense in Mexico
This article analyzes a case involving Yakiri Rubio Aupart, who was falsely imprisoned for exercising her right to self-defense. Her story sheds light on the contemporary application of social and legal norms concerning autodefensa, or women’s rights to defend themselves, in Mexico.
Contextual Background
- Case Overview: Yakiri was apprehended after intervening in an altercation that led her into a struggle with the alleged assailant. Her actions resulted in him being severely wounded, but he survived.
- Public Support: The case has garnered significant public attention and support for Yakiri’s plight from various advocacy groups and individuals who see her as a symbol of the fight against gender-based violence in Mexico, which is known to be rampant.
- “Angelic Defense”: As per comments made by Yakiri’s father during a public demonstration for justice on December 29, he argued that the social attitude towards women—who are often victims of violence but also frequently defend themselves against it—needs to change.
- “Comparative Cases”: The article draws parallels with cases like Marissa Alexander in Florida and Joan Little & Inez García’s experiences, which reflect broader struggles for justice faced by women who resort to self-defense.
“Innocence” Challenged: The Court of Public Opinion vs. Official Injustice
“Yaki’s Trials”: Despite Yakiri not being charged, she remains incarcerated with no access to basic rights such as communication and medical care for her injuries. The legal system has been accused of failing the woman who dared defend herself against violence.
“Jailing a Hero”:
- “Victim or Villain?”: While some may see Yakiri as culpable, her actions are viewed by many as justifiable self-defense. This is demonstrated through the public’s vocal support for justice and freedom of expression.
- “Jailing Perspectives:”: The article raises questions about society’s reactions to women who have been wrongly accused, highlighting that Yakiri now stands as a victim rather than the perpetror due to societal prejudices and biases.
“A Call for Justice”: The Persistent Fight Against Impunity in Mexico
“Marching For Freedom”: A march organized by supporters of Yakiri took place on December 29, with speeches and calls to action echoed throughout. Prominent figures spoke out against violence towards women and for the broader justice demanded.
“The Ripple Effect””: Inspiring Change Beyond One Woman’s Case
“Broader Impact: Yakiri’s case is not isolated but represents a wider movement for women across Mexico and globally, who stand up against violence. The article implies that change begins with individuals like Yakiirim demanding justice.
Preguntas frecuentes
“`html
FAQs About Yakiri Rubio Aupart’s Case of Self-Defense Rights In Mexico
What is the background leading to Yakiri being detained?
Yakiri was apprehended after she intervened in a fight, wherein her actions led to severe injuries inflicted upon an alleged assailant.
Why has public opinion been largely supportive of Yakiri’s actions?
Public attention and backing for Yakiri have surged as she is seen by many advocacy groups and individuals as a figurehead in the struggle against gender-based violence, especially pertinent to Mexico.
“Angelic Defense”: What did Yakiri’s father say during his public demonstration?
During a rally for justice on December 29th, he criticized societal attitudes towards women who are victims of violence but frequently defend themselves.
“Comparative Cases”: How does Yakiri’s case relate to similar cases?
The article compares her circumstances with others such as Marissa Alexander in Florida and Joan Little & Inez García, who have also faced challenges regarding self-defense.
“Innocence” Challenged: What is the contradiction between public perception and official actions?
Yakiri’s case highlights a discrep0n as she remains incarcerated despite not being charged, facing issues like restricted communication and untreated medical care.
“Jailing a Hero”: How do societal views of Yakiri conflict?
While some view her actions with disapproval or as an act against self-defense, the majority recognize them as justifiable and defend her right to stand up for herself.
“A Call for Justice”: What response did Yakiri’s supporters receive?
Yakiri’s followers organized a march on December 29th, where prominent figures spoke out against violence towards women and stressed the need for justice.
“The Ripple Effect”: How does Yakiri’s case inspire change?
Her situation is seen as part of a broader fight by women across Mexico, advocating for their rights to defend themselves. It exemplifies the push towards demanding justice and societal transformation.
“`
Texto original (2014)
Este artículo analiza un caso de desinformación que involucra a Yakiri Rubio Aupart, una joven mujer enjuiciada injustamente por su defensa propia. Se explora cómo las normas sociales y legales actuales sobre la autodefensa para mujeres están siendo aplicadas críticamente aquí. Además, se examina el impacto del caso dentro de un contexto más amplio que abarca cuestiones feministas en México y a nivel mundial.
Imágenes, traducción y publicación original por Amigos de Mumia MX (cc)
#FreeYakiri
. . .I have faith in you. You’re like my family that never gives up. And I have faith that I’ll soon regain my freedom. But it also makes me furious to be in here, locked up for fighting and defending my life against the man who was attacking me, while there’s a motherfucker walking around out there like he hasn’t done a thing. I’m petitioning the Supreme Court to grant me my freedom because I love life; that’s why I fought and that’s why I’m alive. And I want to live my life and enjoy it with my family and people that I love. I want to believe that justice exists for women in my city and that it exists in our Mexico. Just as I fought for my life, I’m now fighting for my freedom, and I want you to keep on supporting me, because by doing so, you’re supporting your own daughters as well. . .
These words written by Yakiri Rubí Rubio Aupart were read at the end of a march to the Benito Juarez Monument from the Angel of Independence in Mexico City on Sunday, December 29, to demand the immediate freedom of a young woman who’s been wrongfully imprisoned for the last twenty days. All afternoon, family members denounced many of the injustices in the case, and a good number of women responded to the open invitation to speak out. Their supportive remarks reflected different points of view but made it clear that the treatment given to Yakiri reflects the situation of violence, feminicide and impunity experienced every day by thousands of women in this country and the world.
Beyond a shadow of a doubt, Yaki is being held prisoner because she dared to live. The 20-year old couldn’t keep two brutes from forcing her into a hotel and raping her. But when Miguel Ángel Rodríguez Anaya tried to stab her to death, she was able to twist his wrist around, which resulted in the knife plunging into his own jugular vein. Due to his death, Yaki now faces charges of aggravated homicide even though she’s the one who was illegally deprived of her freedom and subjected to rape and attempted murder. Meanwhile, the other rapist, Luis Omar Rodríguez Anaya, walks free.
“Mancera, get this. Yaki is innocent,” shouted hundreds of people. Some of the phrases painted on placards or bodies read as follows: “Immediate freedom for Yaki,” “Women have the right to legitimate defense, too” “Justice,” “Nothing justifies sexual violence,” “NO means NO,” “Defending our lives is not a crime, Free Yaki, Free us all,” “Sexist violence is a crime, jail for defending yourself, as well,” “Machete for machotes,” “Applause, respect, support and admiration for women who defend themselves. NO PUNISHMENT. Yakiri, you are not alone.”
Before the march set out from the Angel, Yaki’s mother spoke about her daughter in an interview:
“Hello, I’m Marina, Yakiri’s mother. Just to comment about her situation in prison, she’s really happy about all the support she’s gotten from people, and about all the letters people have sent. Now she’s in the Tepepan prison hospital where she feels more relaxed. She has a little more protection and somewhat better treatment. She’s been there for ten days.”
At first she was in the Santa Martha prison where several women beat her badly, including one who said she was the “sister of the man killed.” However, says Marina, “after investigating the girl, we know she has no connection with him. They gave her something like fifty pesos (less than $4 USD) to beat up my daughter. She’s been in prison with four different names, which tells us that she’s well into criminal activity, so she was willing to do it.” But aside from that, Yaki was threatened by other inmates were also paid, and she couldn’t rest easy. After a complaint was filed with the Human Rights Commission, they transferred her to a protected area, but she was kept under lock and key and could only leave the area in the custody of three people.
“Her arrest and imprisonment has been a tremendous shock for us,” says Marina. “Her status changed from that of victim to victimizer. She went the public prosecutor’s office to press charges for rape and attempted murder, but since the perpetrators were neighbors of one of the prosecutors in Agency 50, her legal situation changed dramatically. While she was there, they never told her she was under arrest. They just left her there incommunicado for ten hours. They never let her make a phone call to the family. They gave her nothing to eat. They just held her there. She was finally able to send a message to a friend on her cell phone and that’s how we found out, but not until the next day. She went to the prosecutor’s office on Monday December 9 at 10:30 that night and we learned that she was still there on Tuesday at 11:30 in the morning.”
At first they refused to investigate and confirm the charge of rape in spite of photographs and other evidence, including deep cuts and serious injuries that she suffered during the attack. She received no medical treatment for those wounds. The suture that a paramedic gave her for a deep cut on her arm was so badly done that it got infected and is still giving her trouble. They didn’t give her any antiretroviral drugs or the 72-hour pill. No medical attention whatsoever.
Ten days later, the Sex Crimes Division finally did a preliminary investigation and began to take charge of the matter. Now it’s been established that the rape did take place.
“We’ve been to see her every visiting day. Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday and Sunday. Now she feels a little more relaxed. We’d like to thank all the people who are supporting us, those who’ve been supportive from the very first. Words can’t express the way I feel. As Yaki’s mother, I really feel blessed. I never thought there would be such a positive outpouring from people. I’m very grateful.”
People who spoke at the march included Norma Andrade, founder of Bring our Daughters Home, and her granddaughter Jade, who continue to demand justice for their daughter and mother Lilia Alejandra and so many other women murdered in Cd. Juárez; Sergio Ferrer, who urged support for the freedom of political prisoner Nestora Salgada of the Community Police in Olinalá, Guerrero; and the families of the disappeared youth in the Heaven Bar case. One of the mothers stated that the supposed remains found were not those of their children and that they’ve had no help whatsoever from the authorities in finding them.
Yaki’s situation brings to mind the cases of other women who have defended themselves against violence, including Marissa Alexander in Florida, sentenced to 20 years in prison for firing a warning shot at her abusive husband who was attacking and threatening to kill her. After passing more than a thousand days in prison, Marissa finally got out on bail to continue fighting her case. In the early 1970s widespread public support was a key factor in winning the exoneration of Inez García and Joan Little, two women who killed their rapists in the United States.
In the march to free Yakiri, her father José Luis Rubio commented as the march left the Angel that in a society marked by scorn and hatred of women, where feminicides are on the rise, “we have to love our daughters. I’m talking about all our daughters in Mexico and the world. And when they find it necessary to defend themselves, we must defend them.” He explained that it had been hard for him to accept the fact that his daughter is a lesbian but that now he admires her bravery and feels totally proud of her. “Now Yaki is not only our daughter, she’s your daughter, too. Let’s free Yaki!”
At the end of the march, José Luis pointed out the absurdity of the charges against Yakiri by asking: How can a girl weighing less than a 100 pounds stab a 198-pound man sixteen times without him lifting a finger in his own defense? He denounced his daughter’s assailants, “call them criminals or call them public officials,” as well as the “low-life press” that criminalizes women who are obliged to defend themselves. He asked: “Why all the hatred of women? What message do they get when they are locked up for exerting their right to self-defense? Why do they have to endure sexual assault and rape and then pray to God that their rapist won’t kill them?”
To close the demonstration, flowers, placards, and purple and white balloons were placed at the Juarez monument.
