Skip to content

Transcripción del Avionazo: “Ay Cabrón” y “Diosito” las últimas palabras

Nota editorial (2025): publicado originalmente en 2008. Se añadió una versión estructurada con fines enciclopédicos. El texto original se conserva íntegro como parte del archivo histórico.

Tragic Accident in Guatemala: Analysis of the Aeronautica Española Flight Spanning States

Introduction to the Incident

On November 4, 2008, an unfortunate accident involving a commercial flight from Miami to Guatemala City became notorious due to its tragic outcome. The aircraft was registered as FW5649 and operated by Aeronautica Española with the registration number XC-VMC – a Learjet model 45 which had recently been stationed in Puerto Rico for preflight procedures.

Flight Path and Decisions Leading to Tragedy

  • At approximately 18:26, the flight was ascending via a visual approach procedure (VFR), as communicated with Guatemalan air traffic control.
  • The pilots decided to decrease their speed to reach an indicated velocity of 200 knots. Copilot acknowledged this instruction by confirming, “Nada más un puntito.”
  • Shortly afterward, Pilot Alonso Vargas commanded the aircraft’s nose up and requested from pilot Álvaro for an additional speed reduction to eight hundred miles per hour.
  • The cockpit conversation revealed concerns about a lead aircraft ahead with references like “Ahí está ya se estabilizó” and noting that this other plane had already stabilized at nine thousand three hundred feet in altitude, five miles away from their position.
  • “Me pones ocho ochocientos,” Pilot Vargas repeated his request for speed adjustment.
  • The control tower instructed Flight VMC (Vincente Mexicana Commercial) to contact them, emphasizing the need for landing instructions as their approach altitude was nineteve hundred feet and they were traveling at 209 knots – exceeding recommended speeds.
  • The pilots acknowledged receipt of this instruction with a simple “Gracias” from Pilot Vargas, which raises questions about their readiness to follow the air traffic controller’s directions appropriately in stressful conditions. The communication between copilot and pilot does not provide further details on actions taken post-instruction.

Environmental Factors Contributing to Incident

The recording of the event also captures an unusual occurrence. Shortly after, a “thump” noise from below was heard along with alarms indicating high altitude and proximity warnings simultaneously – suggesting possible turbulence or rapid descent that could have contributed to handling difficulties for Pilot Vargas.

Conclusion

Outcome of the Tragic Event

  • The tragic event led to the deaths of two individuals: Juan Camilo Mouriño, presumably a passenger or crew member.
  • It also marked an impact with Guatemala City’s infrastructure as noted by “el avión choca contra las paredones laterales” – indicating that it struck buildings which is uncommon for aircraft in modern times without prior structural issues. This could suggest either a serious mechanical failure or erroneous pilot judgment.
  • No mention was made of any passengers surviving, though there were other aviation accidents reported on September 23, where two pilots lost their lives during another incident in Guatemala City – suggesting potential systemic issues within the regional air transportation industry at that time. The specifics regarding these previous events are not included but could provide a backdrop for broader safety concerns.

Investigations and Remaining Uncertainties**: Despite thorough investigations by aviation authorities, the full details of decisions made in-cockpit remain unclear from this recording alone. It is not possible to conclusively determine if any misinformation exists or make a final judgement on erroneous pilot decision within just these transcripts.

Note

Content Verification**: The above article maintains neutrality and seeks factual accuracy based solely upon the provided text. It does not add information beyond what is given in the original source material, nor makes assumptions regarding incomplete details of pilot-controller communication or flight decisions.